
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Quadro P4200
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P4200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P4200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅62.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 488.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
- ❌130.5% longer card at 242mm vs 105mm.
Quadro P4200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 242mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌200.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P4200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P4200
The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P4200's 10,376 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 95.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1647 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+96% | 10,376 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+113% | 7.589 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+1% | 1647 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+471% | 0.84 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 256-bit on the Quadro P4200. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro P4200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P4200's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P4200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 105mm |
| Height | 112mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 103.8+2% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Quadro P4200 launched at $1200. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 66.8% cheaper ($801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.6 (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 491.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-67% | $1200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+492% | 8.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #73 | #266 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














