G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅62.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 488.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
❌130.5% longer card at 242mm vs 105mm.

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 242mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
200.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

✅62.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 488.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 242mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
❌130.5% longer card at 242mm vs 105mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
200.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P4200?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 62.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 10,376 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro P4200 is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018, 95.8% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about $801 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $1,200 MSRP, and you are getting 62.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 95.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 488.8%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P4200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P4200 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,200 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro P4200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
1080p
low	152 FPS	127 FPS
medium	137 FPS	108 FPS
high	118 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	64 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	103 FPS
medium	107 FPS	85 FPS
high	91 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	47 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	44 FPS
medium	65 FPS	38 FPS
high	50 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro P4200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
1080p
low	425 FPS	230 FPS
medium	366 FPS	196 FPS
high	296 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	121 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	165 FPS
medium	229 FPS	139 FPS
high	190 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	97 FPS
medium	114 FPS	80 FPS
high	96 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro P4200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
1080p
low	859 FPS	467 FPS
medium	693 FPS	374 FPS
high	602 FPS	311 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	233 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	350 FPS
medium	529 FPS	280 FPS
high	452 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	175 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	233 FPS
medium	346 FPS	187 FPS
high	275 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	117 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro P4200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
1080p
low	580 FPS	257 FPS
medium	514 FPS	226 FPS
high	424 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	152 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	193 FPS
medium	427 FPS	169 FPS
high	335 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	105 FPS
medium	266 FPS	87 FPS
high	234 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro P4200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P4200

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P4200's 10,376 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 95.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1647 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
G3D Mark Score	20,312+96%	10,376
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	4864+111%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+113%	7.589 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+1%	1647 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	152+6%	144
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+471%	0.84 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro P4200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P4200's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P4200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro P4200
TDP	200W	100W-50%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	105mm
Height	112mm	82mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80
Perf/Watt	101.6	103.8+2%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P4200 launched at $1200. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 66.8% less ($801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.6 (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 491.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).