
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅159.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌400% higher power demand at 200W vs 40W.
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 200W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro T2000 Max-Q
2019Why buy it
- ✅159.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 200W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌400% higher power demand at 200W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro T2000 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T2000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro T2000 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 6,959 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 191.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1620 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+192% | 6,959 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+375% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+388% | 3.318 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+3% | 1620 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+138% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+380% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 40W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 174.0+71% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | TU117 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #357 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












