
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅156.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 409.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100.5% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅156.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 409.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100.5% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro V520?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V520 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 90 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro V520

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro V520's 8,000 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 153.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro V520 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+154% | 8,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+120% | 7.373 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+4% | 1600 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V520 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V520 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro V520's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V520). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+185% | 35.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 50.1% less ($401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 10.0 (Radeon Pro V520) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 409% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+409% | 10.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 12 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #73 | #218 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












