GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Radeon R9 285
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R9 285 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R9 285 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅167.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 89.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 285
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 242mm, a 21mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R9 285 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Radeon R9 285
The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 285's 6,680 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 204.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+204% | 6,680 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+171% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+392% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+36% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+991% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 285 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) — a 154.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+155% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 5.1% difference. The Radeon R9 285 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 190W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 221mm |
| Height | 112mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+189% | 35.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon R9 285 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 was 37.6% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 89.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $249-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+90% | 26.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Tonga |
| Release | December 1 2020 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #73 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 285
