
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X / 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅121.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 290X / 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon R9 290X / 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅121.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R9 290X / 390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290X / 390X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 94 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 290X / 390X

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 290X / 390X
Radeon R9 290X / 390X
The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,380 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 290X / 390X's 8,380 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 142.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+142% | 8,380 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+73% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+174% | 5.914 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+59% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 176+16% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+596% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+40% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 290X / 390X's 275W — a 31.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-27% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 275mm |
| Height | 112mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-21% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+233% | 30.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 27.3% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 232.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-27% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+233% | 15.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Grenada |
| Release | December 1 2020 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












