
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6650M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,171 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6650M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,171 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 6650M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6650M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 130 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 6650M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 15,171 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 33.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6650M) with 152 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+34% | 15,171 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+171% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+87% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2416 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+36% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+860% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+36% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 120W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 126.4+24% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6650M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #73 | #148 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












