G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅18222.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 143196% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌780% higher power demand at 220W vs 25W.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 220W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18222.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 554200% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $370 more expensive on MSRP at $499 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 143196% (44.4 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 4 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 554200%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
G3D Mark Score	22,172+554200%	4
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	5888+557%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+530%	3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+10%	1575 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	184+188%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
DirectX	12 Ultimate+71%	7.0
OpenGL	4.6+283%	1.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	None
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 25W — a 159.2% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 55°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
TDP	220W	25W-89%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	—
Height	112mm	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	55°C-27%
Perf/Watt	100.8+50300%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 74.1% cheaper ($370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% better value.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP	$499	$129-74%
Performance per Dollar	44.4	0.0
Codename	GA104	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release	September 1 2020	August 1 2020
Ranking	#63	#523

Search GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon

Search GeForce2 MX/MX 400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.