G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce3 Ti 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅18222.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 516802.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌32.2% longer card at 242mm vs 183mm.

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅269.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 184).
✅Measures 183mm instead of 242mm, a 59mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18222.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 738966.7% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 3), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 more expensive on MSRP at $499 vs $349, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 516802.3% (44.4 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce3 Ti 500

The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 3 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 738966.7%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce3 Ti 500 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 170 (GeForce3 Ti 500) with 184 Tensor cores vs 680.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce3 Ti 500
G3D Mark Score	22,172+738967%	3
Architecture	Ampere	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	5888	21760+270%
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS	104.8 TFLOPS+416%
Boost Clock	1725 MHz	2407 MHz+40%
ROPs	96	176+83%
TMUs	184	680+270%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB	21.3 MB+267%
L2 Cache	4 MB	96 MB+2300%
Ray Tracing Cores	46	170+270%
Tensor Cores	184	680+270%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce3 Ti 500
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 Ti 500 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce3 Ti 500
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	96 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce3 Ti 500
DirectX	12 Ultimate+48%	8.1
Vulkan	1.4	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+207%	1.5
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 500).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce3 Ti 500
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	None
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	MPEG-2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 575W — a 89.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 183mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce3 Ti 500
TDP	220W-62%	575W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	183mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80
Perf/Watt	100.8	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the GeForce3 Ti 500 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce3 Ti 500 was 30.1% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2020).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP	$499	$349-30%
Performance per Dollar	44.4	0.0
Codename	GA104	GB202
Release	September 1 2020	January 30 2025
Ranking	#63	#3

Search GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon

Search GeForce3 Ti 500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.