
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+303.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 142.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌1366.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 220W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023Why buy it
- ✅+303.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 142.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 220W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1366.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 303.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+303% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+147100% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1950 MHz+13% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 174.5% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 366.7+264% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) costs 39.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 18.3 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 142.6% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $300-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+143% | 18.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | September 1 2020 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #496 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













