G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅+2945.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 662.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID K140Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $374 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (728 vs 22,172).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

GRID K140Q

2013

Why buy it

✅+2945.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 662.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $374 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (728 vs 22,172).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GRID K140Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,172 vs 728 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3070 is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GRID K140Q is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013, 2945.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 512 MB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3070 is about 299.2% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $125 MSRP, and you are getting 2945.6% higher G3D Mark. GRID K140Q really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GRID K140Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GRID K140Q is 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 728 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

GRID K140Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
1080p
low	158 FPS	33 FPS
medium	140 FPS	26 FPS
high	123 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	25 FPS
medium	109 FPS	20 FPS
high	96 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	12 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	16 FPS
medium	67 FPS	13 FPS
high	52 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open GRID K140Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
1080p
low	470 FPS	33 FPS
medium	405 FPS	26 FPS
high	327 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	25 FPS
medium	246 FPS	20 FPS
high	213 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	12 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	16 FPS
medium	120 FPS	12 FPS
high	105 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open GRID K140Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
1080p
low	885 FPS	33 FPS
medium	712 FPS	26 FPS
high	619 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	25 FPS
medium	557 FPS	20 FPS
high	473 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	12 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	16 FPS
medium	388 FPS	13 FPS
high	330 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open GRID K140Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
1080p
low	600 FPS	33 FPS
medium	527 FPS	26 FPS
high	433 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	25 FPS
medium	433 FPS	20 FPS
high	339 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	12 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	16 FPS
medium	270 FPS	13 FPS
high	238 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open GRID K140Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GRID K140Q

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

GRID K140Q

The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GRID K140Q's 728 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 2945.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GRID K140Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
G3D Mark Score	22,172+2946%	728
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+283%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+787%	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	184+44%	128
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+4362%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K140Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K140Q has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
DirectX	12 Ultimate+9%	11_0
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 2.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	GRID K140Q
TDP	220W-2%	225W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	267mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	100.8+3050%	3.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GRID K140Q launched at $125. The GRID K140Q costs 74.9% less ($374 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.8 (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 665.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).