GeForce RTX 3070 vs GRID K260Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070

2020Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1725 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS

GRID K260Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GRID K260Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GRID K260Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

  • +651.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $438 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $937 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1311.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $937 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID K260Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,949 vs 22,172).
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 87.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $937 MSRPvs$499 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 651.8% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 2,949), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $438 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $937, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1311.8% (44.4 vs 3.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GRID K260Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

NVIDIA

GRID K260Q

The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GRID K260Q's 2,949 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 651.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GRID K260Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,536 (GRID K260Q). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070GRID K260Q
G3D Mark Score
22,172+652%
2,949
Architecture
Ampere
Kepler
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
5888+283%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
20.31 TFLOPS+787%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
96+200%
32
TMUs
184+44%
128
L1 Cache
5.8 MB+4362%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K260Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070GRID K260Q
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K260Q carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 64-bit on the GRID K260Q. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K260Q) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070GRID K260Q
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GRID K260Q's 225W — a 2.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (GRID K260Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070GRID K260Q
TDP
220W-2%
225W
Recommended PSU
650W
350W-46%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
100.8+669%
13.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the GRID K260Q launched at $937. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3070 was 46.7% cheaper ($438 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.1 (GRID K260Q) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1332.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070GRID K260Q
MSRP
$499-47%
$937
Performance per Dollar
44.4+1332%
3.1
Codename
GA104
GK104
Release
September 1 2020
June 28 2013
Ranking
#63
#589

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.