
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+400.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1906.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
GRID P6-4Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,429 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020GRID P6-4Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅+400.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1906.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,429 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GRID P6-4Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P6-4Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GRID P6-4Q

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

GRID P6-4Q
GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GRID P6-4Q's 4,429 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 400.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GRID P6-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+401% | 4,429 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+283% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+816% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+92% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+936% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P6-4Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-4Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GRID P6-4Q's 100W — a 75% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (GRID P6-4Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+128% | 44.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 75% less ($1501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1918.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-75% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+1918% | 2.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM204 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












