
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+133.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 77.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,493 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅+133.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 77.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,493 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Intel Arc Pro A60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro A60 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Intel Arc Pro A60

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel Arc Pro A60
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 9,493 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 133.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro A60) with 184 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+134% | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+142% | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2050 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+188% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 256+39% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 51.4% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 130W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+38% | 73.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380. The Intel Arc Pro A60 costs 23.8% less ($119 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 77.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $380-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+78% | 25.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | DG2-256 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












