GeForce RTX 3070
Iris Plus Graphics 950
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1139.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1366.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 220W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 1,789 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1139.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 8 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+1139% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1050% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+1883% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 184+475% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 174.5% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 119.3+18% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 950 was 100+% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA104 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #63 | #634 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Iris Plus Graphics 950
