
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- β +1791.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 468.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 22,172).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β +1791.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 468.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 22,172).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Iris Pro Graphics 5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 1,172 β the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1791.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 8 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+1792% | 1,172 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1740% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+2545% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+44% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+2300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 184+360% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W β a 152% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | β |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+158% | 39.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 69.9% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) β the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 469.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+469% | 7.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #63 | #835 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












