
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro 2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+2238.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2707.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌254.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 62W.
- ❌36% longer card at 242mm vs 178mm.
Quadro 2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 220W, a 158W reduction.
- ✅Measures 178mm instead of 242mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (948 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro 2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅+2238.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2707.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 220W, a 158W reduction.
- ✅Measures 178mm instead of 242mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌254.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 62W.
- ❌36% longer card at 242mm vs 178mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (948 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro 2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro 2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 11 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro 2000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro 2000's 948 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 2238.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+2239% | 948 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+2967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+4131% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+475% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2220% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro 2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+700% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11_0 (Quadro 2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VP4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 112.1% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 178mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 62W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 178mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+559% | 15.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 16.7% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.6 (Quadro 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 2675% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-17% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+2675% | 1.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GF106 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #63 | #902 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












