GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro 400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro 400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅6261.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 4973.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Quadro 400

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6261.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 14881.1% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 14nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $330 more expensive on MSRP at $499 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4973.8% (44.4 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro 400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro 400's 148 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 14881.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1252 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro 400
G3D Mark Score	22,172+14881%	148
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	5888+2200%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+3068%	0.641 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+38%	1252 MHz
ROPs	96+500%	16
TMUs	184+1050%	16
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+6344%	0.09 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro 400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 400 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 64-bit on the Quadro 400. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro 400
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro 400
DirectX	12 Ultimate+20%	10_1
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro 400's 30W — a 152% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro 400
TDP	220W	30W-86%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	168mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	100.8+1957%	4.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Quadro 400 launched at $169. On MSRP, Quadro 400 was 66.1% cheaper ($330 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.9 (Quadro 400) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 4833.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro 400
MSRP	$499	$169-66%
Performance per Dollar	44.4+4833%	0.9
Codename	GA104	GP107
Release	September 1 2020	February 7 2017
Ranking	#63	#741

Search GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon

Search Quadro 400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.