
GeForce RTX 3070

Quadro K1200
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K1200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅554.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 349.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌388.9% higher power demand at 220W vs 45W.
Quadro K1200
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 220W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro K1200's 2,965 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 647.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+648% | 2,965 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1050% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+1820% | 1.0578 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+67% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+475% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2220% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K1200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1200 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 64-bit on the Quadro K1200. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro K1200) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 132.1% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 45W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+53% | 65.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Quadro K1200 launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro K1200 was 39.9% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 9.9 (Quadro K1200) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 348.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $300-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+348% | 9.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM107 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 28 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #586 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














