G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅1450.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1582.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌331.4% higher power demand at 220W vs 51W.
❌19.8% longer card at 242mm vs 202mm.

Quadro K2000

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 51W instead of 220W, a 169W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 242mm, a 40mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1450.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1301.5% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 1,582), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1582.4% (44.4 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro K2000's 1,582 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1301.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K2000
G3D Mark Score	22,172+1302%	1,582
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+1433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+2672%	0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs	96+500%	16
TMUs	184+475%	32
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+19233%	0.03 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K2000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K2000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K2000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264 (Quadro K2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K2000
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 124.7% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K2000
TDP	220W	51W-77%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	202mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	100.8+225%	31.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3070 was 16.7% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.6 (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1607.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K2000
MSRP	$499-17%	$599
Performance per Dollar	44.4+1608%	2.6
Codename	GA104	GK107
Release	September 1 2020	March 1 2013
Ranking	#63	#756

Search GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.