G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅119.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $4,766 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2826.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro K6000

2013

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2013 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
955.1% HIGHER MSRP
$5,265 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 119.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 177.4% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 7,993), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,766 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $5,265, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2826.8% (44.4 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro K6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro K6000's 7,993 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 177.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 902 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K6000
G3D Mark Score	22,172+177%	7,993
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+104%	2880
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+291%	5.196 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+91%	902 MHz
ROPs	96+100%	48
TMUs	184	240+30%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+2422%	0.23 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K6000 carries 12 GB. Quadro K6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 112.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 256-bit on the Quadro K6000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K6000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+112%	211 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K6000
DirectX	12 Ultimate+9%	11.0
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K6000
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	NVENC 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 2.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 265mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K6000
TDP	220W-2%	225W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	265mm
Height	112mm	110mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	100.8+184%	35.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Quadro K6000 launched at $5265. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3070 was 90.5% cheaper ($4766 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.5 (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 2860% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro K6000
MSRP	$499-91%	$5265
Performance per Dollar	44.4+2860%	1.5
Codename	GA104	GK110B
Release	September 1 2020	July 23 2013
Ranking	#63	#318

Search GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon

Search Quadro K6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.