
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro M3000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅265.4% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅265.4% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro M3000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M3000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 63 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro M3000M

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro M3000M's 5,574 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 297.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro M3000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 (Quadro M3000M). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+298% | 5,574 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+475% | 1,024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+845% | 2.15 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+188% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1426% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M3000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M3000M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro M3000M) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro M3000M's 75W — a 98.3% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro M3000M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+36% | 74.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GM204 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #411 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












