
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+232% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $292 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 426.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,679 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌58.5% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅+232% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $292 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 426.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,679 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌58.5% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro M4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro M4000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro M4000's 6,679 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 232%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+232% | 6,679 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+360% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+714% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+70% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+130% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1134% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) — a 112.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+112% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 75% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-9% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+51% | 66.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 36.9% less ($292 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.4 (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 428.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-37% | $791 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+429% | 8.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM204 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












