
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+241.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,500 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅+241.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,500 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro P3200 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 73 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro P3200 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 6,500 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 241.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1404 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+241% | 6,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+229% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+304% | 5.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+23% | 1404 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+64% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+779% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 98.3% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+16% | 86.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #63 | #292 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












