
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro P4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅81.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $316 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 216.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌109.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 105W.
Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 220W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌63.3% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅81.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $316 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 216.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 220W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌109.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌63.3% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro P4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro P4000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro P4000's 11,431 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 94%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+94% | 11,431 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+229% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+283% | 5.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+17% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+64% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+779% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.0 (Quadro P4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro P4000's 105W — a 70.8% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro P4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 105W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 108.9+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro P4000 launched at $815. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 38.8% less ($316 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 14.0 (Quadro P4000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 217.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-39% | $815 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+217% | 14.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #63 | #239 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












