
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅133.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅133.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro P4200 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro P4200 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro P4200 Max-Q's 7,800 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 184.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+184% | 7,800 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+156% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+198% | 6.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+17% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+590% | 0.84 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro P4200 Max-Q's 100W — a 75% difference. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+29% | 78.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #63 | #234 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












