G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅+89.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌450% higher power demand at 220W vs 40W.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 40W instead of 220W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,715 vs 22,172).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021

Why buy it

✅+89.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 40W instead of 220W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌450% higher power demand at 220W vs 40W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,715 vs 22,172).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,172 vs 11,715 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3070 is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is a 2021 model from an older generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 89.3% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 89.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the newer 2021 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (40W vs 220W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?

Yes. Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 220W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3070. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3070 currently gives you 89.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
1080p
low	158 FPS	132 FPS
medium	140 FPS	111 FPS
high	123 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	56 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	113 FPS
medium	109 FPS	93 FPS
high	96 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	40 FPS
medium	67 FPS	36 FPS
high	52 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
1080p
low	470 FPS	111 FPS
medium	405 FPS	87 FPS
high	327 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	52 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	81 FPS
medium	246 FPS	61 FPS
high	213 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	50 FPS
medium	120 FPS	39 FPS
high	105 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
1080p
low	885 FPS	516 FPS
medium	712 FPS	422 FPS
high	619 FPS	351 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	264 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	377 FPS
medium	557 FPS	316 FPS
high	473 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	198 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	227 FPS
medium	388 FPS	201 FPS
high	330 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	104 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
1080p
low	600 FPS	267 FPS
medium	527 FPS	227 FPS
high	433 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	197 FPS
medium	433 FPS	171 FPS
high	339 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	108 FPS
medium	270 FPS	85 FPS
high	238 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 11,715 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 89.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1410 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score	22,172+89%	11,715
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	5888+557%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+704%	2.527 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+22%	1410 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	184+229%	56
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+559%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 40W — a 138.5% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
TDP	220W	40W-82%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	100.8	292.9+191%