
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅247.7% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 173.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
- ❌55.1% longer card at 242mm vs 156mm.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 242mm, a 86mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅247.7% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 173.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 242mm, a 86mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
- ❌55.1% longer card at 242mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro T1000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro T1000's 6,505 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 240.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+241% | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+19% | 1455 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 156mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 130.1+29% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. The Quadro T1000 costs 19.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 172.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $400-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+172% | 16.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU117 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #63 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












