
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+293.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 18.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,637 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅+293.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 18.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,637 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 61 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 5,637 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 293.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+293% | 5,637 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+207% | 1920 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 115.2 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) — a 288.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+289% | 115.2 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit x2 |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 112.7+12% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire launched at $150. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire costs 69.9% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 37.6 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 18.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+18% | 37.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | Blackcomb XT |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #63 | #537 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












