
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+41.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,633 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅+41.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,633 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 15,633 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 41.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+42% | 15,633 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+64% | 3584 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+89% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+15% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 184 | 224 ×2+22% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+559% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+93% | 52.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #63 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












