
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+328.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,169 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅+328.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,169 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon Pro Vega 20?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 20 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon Pro Vega 20

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 5,169 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 328.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1283 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+329% | 5,169 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+360% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+518% | 3.284 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+34% | 1283 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+130% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1771% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 75% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+95% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 costs 100+% less ($499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 12 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #63 | #435 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












