
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+9.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 393% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,270 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌350.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,249 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅+9.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 393% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,270 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌350.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,249 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon PRO W6800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6800 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 313 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 912 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 730 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 228 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 609 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 228 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon PRO W6800

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon PRO W6800
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 20,270 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 9.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+9% | 20,270 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+14% | 17.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2320 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+24% | 81.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 77.8% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 393.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W6800 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-78% | $2249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+393% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #74 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












