GeForce RTX 3070
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅14.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1079.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 400W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌601.2% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 400W vs 220W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 13,182 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 68.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+68% | 13,182 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+34% | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1967 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 ×2 |
| TMUs | 184 | 240 ×2+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60 ×2+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 864 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 58.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-45% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 280mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+205% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3070 was 85.7% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1068.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-86% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+1068% | 3.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #157 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
