
GeForce RTX 3070

Radeon R5 A240
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R5 A240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R5 A240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R5 A240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- β 2578.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 671.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
Radeon R5 A240
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $399 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- β2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R5 A240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R5 A240
The Radeon R5 A240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R5 A240's 576 β the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 3749.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R5 A240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 320 (Radeon R5 A240). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A240). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R5 A240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+3749% | 576 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1740% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+4433% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+121% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 184+820% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+7150% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 A240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R5 A240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 A240 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A240. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 A240) β the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R5 A240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R5 A240's 30W β a 152% difference. The Radeon R5 A240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A240). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R5 A240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | β |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+425% | 19.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Radeon R5 A240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R5 A240 was 80% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.8 (Radeon R5 A240) β the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 665.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R5 A240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $100-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+666% | 5.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Oland |
| Release | September 1 2020 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #63 | #911 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














