GeForce RTX 3070
Radeon R7 250
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R7 250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R7 250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R7 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅1689.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 276.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.
- ❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.
Radeon R7 250
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $410 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R7 250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon R7 250
The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R7 250's 1,051 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 2009.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+2010% | 1,051 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+2419% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+64% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 184+667% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+6344% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 250). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 108.8% difference. The Radeon R7 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 65W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+522% | 16.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250 was 82.2% cheaper ($410 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 276.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $89-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+276% | 11.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Oland |
| Release | September 1 2020 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #63 | #871 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R7 250
