
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A365
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅2097.6% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 520.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A365
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon R7 A365
2014Why buy it
- ✅2097.6% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 520.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon R7 A365?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R7 A365 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 9 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R7 A365

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R7 A365
Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R7 A365's 781 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 2738.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+2739% | 781 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+3105% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+109% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 184+667% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+6344% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 A365 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A365 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A365) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 152% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+288% | 26.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109. The Radeon R7 A365 costs 78.2% less ($390 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.2 (Radeon R7 A365) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 516.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $109-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+517% | 7.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | Opal |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #63 | #890 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












