GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 255

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅+1377.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 311.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 10.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌15.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 190W.

Radeon R9 255

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $360 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 190W instead of 220W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,501 vs 22,172).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Radeon R9 255

2014

Why buy it

✅+1377.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 311.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 10.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $360 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 190W instead of 220W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌15.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 190W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,501 vs 22,172).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon R9 255?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,172 vs 1,501 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3070 is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 255 is a 2014 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014, 1377.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3070 is about 259.0% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $139 MSRP, and you are getting 1377.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 255 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 255 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 255 is 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 1,501 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 255 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 255
1080p
low	158 FPS	68 FPS
medium	140 FPS	54 FPS
high	123 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	51 FPS
medium	109 FPS	41 FPS
high	96 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	25 FPS
medium	67 FPS	23 FPS
high	52 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Radeon R9 255

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 255
1080p
low	470 FPS	68 FPS
medium	405 FPS	54 FPS
high	327 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	51 FPS
medium	246 FPS	41 FPS
high	213 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	29 FPS
medium	120 FPS	20 FPS
high	105 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Radeon R9 255

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 255
1080p
low	885 FPS	68 FPS
medium	712 FPS	54 FPS
high	619 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	51 FPS
medium	557 FPS	41 FPS
high	473 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	34 FPS
medium	388 FPS	27 FPS
high	330 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Radeon R9 255

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 255
1080p
low	600 FPS	68 FPS
medium	527 FPS	54 FPS
high	433 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	51 FPS
medium	433 FPS	41 FPS
high	339 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	34 FPS
medium	270 FPS	27 FPS
high	238 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Radeon R9 255

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R9 255

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R9 255

The Radeon R9 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R9 255's 1,501 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1377.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 255 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 255). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 255).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 255
G3D Mark Score	22,172+1377%	1,501
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+229%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+517%	3.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	184+64%	112
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+1218%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 255 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 255
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 255 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 255) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 255
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 255's 190W — a 14.6% difference. The Radeon R9 255 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 400W (Radeon R9 255). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 255
TDP	220W	190W-14%
Recommended PSU	650W	400W-38%
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	242mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	100.8+1176%	7.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 255 launched at $139. The Radeon R9 255 costs 72.1% less ($360 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10.8 (Radeon R9 255) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 311.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).