
GeForce RTX 3070

Radeon R9 295X2
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 295X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 295X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 295X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅95.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 662.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌200.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 295X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 8,734 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 153.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1018 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+154% | 8,734 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+109% | 2816 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+254% | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+69% | 1018 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 184+5% | 176 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+741% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 295X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) — a 614.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+40% | 320 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit x2+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-56% | 500W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-35% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 307mm |
| Height | 112mm | 114mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+476% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3070 was 66.7% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 665.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-67% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+666% | 5.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vesuvius |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #63 | #303 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














