G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅+1011.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 568.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,994 vs 22,172).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅+1011.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 568.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,994 vs 22,172).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon R9 M385X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,172 vs 1,994 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3070 is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 M385X is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015, 1011.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3070 is about 66.3% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 1011.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M385X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 M385X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M385X is 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 1,994 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M385X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	158 FPS	36 FPS
medium	140 FPS	22 FPS
high	123 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	24 FPS
medium	109 FPS	14 FPS
high	96 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	9 FPS
medium	67 FPS	6 FPS
high	52 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Radeon R9 M385X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	470 FPS	57 FPS
medium	405 FPS	31 FPS
high	327 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	28 FPS
medium	246 FPS	15 FPS
high	213 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	8 FPS
medium	120 FPS	5 FPS
high	105 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Radeon R9 M385X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	885 FPS	90 FPS
medium	712 FPS	72 FPS
high	619 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	67 FPS
medium	557 FPS	54 FPS
high	473 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	45 FPS
medium	388 FPS	36 FPS
high	330 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Radeon R9 M385X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	600 FPS	63 FPS
medium	527 FPS	52 FPS
high	433 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	37 FPS
medium	433 FPS	31 FPS
high	339 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	25 FPS
medium	270 FPS	20 FPS
high	238 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Radeon R9 M385X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R9 M385X

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R9 M385X

The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 1,994 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1011.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
G3D Mark Score	22,172+1012%	1,994
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+557%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+930%	1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+57%	1100 MHz
ROPs	96+500%	16
TMUs	184+229%	56
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+2536%	0.22 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M385X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M385X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M385X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M385X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 98.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Radeon R9 M385X
TDP	220W	75W-66%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	100.8+279%	26.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M385X costs 39.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 572.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).