
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M470X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅495.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 379.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M470X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon R9 M470X
2016Why buy it
- ✅495.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 379.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon R9 M470X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M470X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R9 M470X

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R9 M470X
Radeon R9 M470X
The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R9 M470X's 3,244 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 583.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M470X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M470X). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+583% | 3,244 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+557% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+930% | 1.971 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+57% | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+229% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2536% | 0.22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M470X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M470X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M470X) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 M470X's 75W — a 98.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M470X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+133% | 43.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M470X launched at $350. The Radeon R9 M470X costs 29.9% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 9.3 (Radeon R9 M470X) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 377.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $350-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+377% | 9.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Emerald |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #63 | #563 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












