
GeForce RTX 3070

Radeon RX 550
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon RX 550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon RX 550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅652.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 31.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
- ❌56.1% longer card at 242mm vs 155mm.
Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 155mm instead of 242mm, a 87mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon RX 550's 2,674 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 729.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+729% | 2,674 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1050% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+1577% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+46% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+475% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+4362% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3070 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 550) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+300% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 155mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | 155mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+88% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 was 84.2% cheaper ($420 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 31.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $79-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+31% | 33.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Lexa |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #63 | #617 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














