
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6650M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+29.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6650M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 6650M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 220W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,071 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon RX 6650M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+29.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 220W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6650M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,071 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon RX 6650M XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6650M XT make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 192 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 6650M XT

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,071 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon RX 6650M XT's 17,071 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 29.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6650M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 9.896 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 32 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+30% | 17,071 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+105% | 9.896 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2416 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+44% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6650M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6650M XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 6650M XT's 120W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 120W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 142.3+41% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6650M XT launched at $400. The Radeon RX 6650M XT costs 19.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 42.7 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 4% better value. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $400-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+4% | 42.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #63 | #113 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












