
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6900 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌100.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon RX 6900 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6900 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌100.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6900 XT better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 767 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 6900 XT

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 26,729 — the Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 20.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6900 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 26,729+21% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+15% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2250 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 96 | 128+33% |
| TMUs | 184 | 320+74% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+480% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 80+74% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2.5 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-24% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-20% | 2.5 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+13% | 89.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 50.1% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 26.8 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 65.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-50% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+66% | 26.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #63 | #35 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












