
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1083.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 443.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌25.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 175W.
Radeon RX 7500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 220W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,873 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon RX 7500
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1083.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 443.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 220W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌25.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 175W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,873 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon RX 7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7500 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 21 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 7500

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 7500
Radeon RX 7500
The Radeon RX 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,873 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon RX 7500's 1,873 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1083.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7500 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 7500). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7500). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2450 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 36 (Radeon RX 7500) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+1084% | 1,873 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+156% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+80% | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2450 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+28% | 36 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7500 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 216 GB/s (Radeon RX 7500) — a 107.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 7500) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+107% | 216 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 7500's 175W — a 22.8% difference. The Radeon RX 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon RX 7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 175W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+842% | 10.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7500 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 7500 costs 54.1% less ($270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.2 (Radeon RX 7500) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 441.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $229-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+441% | 8.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












