
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅49.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌144.4% higher power demand at 220W vs 90W.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 220W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅49.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 220W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌144.4% higher power demand at 220W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon RX 7600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7600M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 7600M

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 10,999 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 101.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2410 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7600M) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+102% | 10,999 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+229% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+18% | 17.27 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2410 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+64% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+64% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 90W — a 83.9% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 90W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 122.2+21% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #248 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












