G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅+212.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌1366.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 220W, a 205W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 22,172).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅+212.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 220W, a 205W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1366.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 22,172).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than RadeonT 780M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,172 vs 7,098 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3070 is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while RadeonT 780M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 780M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2020, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 4nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 212.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RadeonT 780M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 220W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?

Yes. RadeonT 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 220W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3070. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3070 currently gives you 212.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

RadeonT 780M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	158 FPS	117 FPS
medium	140 FPS	99 FPS
high	123 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	101 FPS
medium	109 FPS	86 FPS
high	96 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	32 FPS
medium	67 FPS	30 FPS
high	52 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	18 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RadeonT 780M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	470 FPS	98 FPS
medium	405 FPS	68 FPS
high	327 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	33 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	67 FPS
medium	246 FPS	45 FPS
high	213 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	35 FPS
medium	120 FPS	25 FPS
high	105 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RadeonT 780M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	885 FPS	319 FPS
medium	712 FPS	256 FPS
high	619 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	160 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	240 FPS
medium	557 FPS	192 FPS
high	473 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	159 FPS
medium	388 FPS	128 FPS
high	330 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	77 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RadeonT 780M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	600 FPS	214 FPS
medium	527 FPS	171 FPS
high	433 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	142 FPS
medium	433 FPS	117 FPS
high	339 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	83 FPS
medium	270 FPS	67 FPS
high	238 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RadeonT 780M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RadeonT 780M

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RadeonT 780M's 7,098 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 212.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M) with 184 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score	22,172+212%	7,098
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	5888+667%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+128%	8.909 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz	2900 MHz+68%
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	184+283%	48
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+2220%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+283%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RadeonT 780M
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 174.5% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.