
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅31.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 269.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (22,172 vs 24,046).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅+8.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌300.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅31.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 269.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+8.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (22,172 vs 24,046).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌300.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 8.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 184 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 24,046+8% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 6144+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+11% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 6 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 48+4% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 192+4% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 24.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+24% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 103.4% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 70W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 343.5+241% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 75% less ($1500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 270% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-75% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+270% | 12.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












