
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+9.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌25.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 175W.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 220W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 22,172).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+9.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 220W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌25.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 175W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 22,172).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 609 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 189 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 914 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 9.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+9% | 20,312 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 12800+117% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+221% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2550 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 184 | 400+117% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 12.5 MB+116% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 100+117% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 400+117% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 16 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 28.6% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 175W — a 22.8% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 175W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 116.1+15% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | AD102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












