
GeForce RTX 3070

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 3070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 961.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅208.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 184).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1262.5% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 28.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 184 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 28,454+28% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 18176+209% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+348% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2505 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 96 | 192+100% |
| TMUs | 184 | 568+209% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 17.8 MB+207% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 142+209% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 568+209% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation carries 48 GB. RTX 6000 Ada Generation gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 114.3% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 384-bit on the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 960 GB/s+114% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+6% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3070 was 92.7% cheaper ($6300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 957.1% better value. The newer card here is RTX 6000 Ada Generation (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-93% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+957% | 4.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #63 | #24 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














