G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅100.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌528.6% higher power demand at 220W vs 35W.
❌195.1% longer card at 242mm vs 82mm.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 220W, a 185W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 242mm, a 160mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅100.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 220W, a 185W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 242mm, a 160mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌528.6% higher power demand at 220W vs 35W.
❌195.1% longer card at 242mm vs 82mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than RTX A2000 Embedded GPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3070 averages 100.4% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,172 vs 11,117 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3070 is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 99.4% more raw performance headroom and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 100.4% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 99.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (35W vs 220W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX A2000 Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?

Yes. RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 220W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3070. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3070 currently gives you 99.4% higher G3D Mark and 100.4% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	158 FPS	105 FPS
medium	140 FPS	88 FPS
high	123 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	91 FPS
medium	109 FPS	75 FPS
high	96 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	36 FPS
medium	67 FPS	33 FPS
high	52 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	470 FPS	124 FPS
medium	405 FPS	100 FPS
high	327 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	90 FPS
medium	246 FPS	70 FPS
high	213 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	44 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	55 FPS
medium	120 FPS	43 FPS
high	105 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	885 FPS	500 FPS
medium	712 FPS	400 FPS
high	619 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	250 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	375 FPS
medium	557 FPS	300 FPS
high	473 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	250 FPS
medium	388 FPS	200 FPS
high	330 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	125 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	600 FPS	229 FPS
medium	527 FPS	196 FPS
high	433 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	176 FPS
medium	433 FPS	153 FPS
high	339 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	99 FPS
medium	270 FPS	78 FPS
high	238 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 11,117 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 99.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1177 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 20 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	22,172+99%	11,117
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	5888+130%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+237%	6.026 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+47%	1177 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	184+130%	80
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+132%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+130%	20
Tensor Cores	184+130%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 145.1% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
TDP	220W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	82mm
Height	112mm	4mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	100.8	317.6+215%