
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX A3000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+74.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,720 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅+74.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,720 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than RTX A3000 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A3000 Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 82 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX A3000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 12,720 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 74.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1230 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 32 (RTX A3000 Mobile) with 184 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+74% | 12,720 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+44% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+101% | 10.08 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+40% | 1230 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+45% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+44% | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+44% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A3000 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 103.4% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 70W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 181.7+80% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A3000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #205 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












